The Sole Proprietor digitized some of the color negatives he shot at the
family party
and found them heavily spotted so he printed two of them out on his laser
printer and took them in to the camera shop to see what the problem
might be. The odd thing to the Sole Proprietor was that the photographs
produced from the negatives had looked fine, but the digitized images taken
from the negatives looked as if a small snow storm were passing through
(the negatives themselves seemed OK under a loupe). The guy at the camera
shop seemed knowledgeable and went over the process used to print them with
the Sole Proprietor. He feels that in this dry weather, static electricity
becomes a real problem and will attract dust to the shiny surface (not the
emulsion surface, oddly) and you have to be careful to eliminate it.
The Sole Proprietor thought he'd looked over the film pretty carefully, but
after he writes his entry
he'll scan a couple more and be especially careful to get rid of any dust
with a camels hair brush and blower. He may need to get a special static
brush as well. He remembers one brand called a "Static Master" (he thinks)
that he used in a darkroom many years ago with a radioactive element that
knocked the static electricity out of the immediate area around the brush.
Yeah, it didn't sound so hot back then either
but we'll see. They were expensive and they didn't really seem to work all
that well (who knows, they'd been sitting in the corner when he found
them and they were sitting in the corner a year later when he left), but
the Sole Proprietor will try most anything if it will fix this problem
once and for all.
He scanned some new slides earlier this evening (not the film negative kind that
produce prints, but the kind you feed one at a time through a slide
projector) and they scanned without difficulty, so its not the scanner itself
or else the slides would look moth eaten as well. He's curious to see what
happens and will mention the results tomorrow or maybe at the bottom of this
entry if he still has any life in him when he's finished (long day). As a
follow up note, he only lost the last two or three frames on the roll he
thought he'd exposed to light when the camera hadn't rewound fully (and
complained yesterday in capital letters). That's good. He'll still have to be
careful and check whenever he rewinds a roll, but he didn't lose anything
too important and he'll be able to send prints to the singers who requested
them at the street fair. A couple of those pictures are included here.